International Journal of Machine Learning, AI & Data Science Evolution
E-ISSN: 3067-5073
A Widely Indexed Open Access Peer Reviewed Multidisciplinary Monthly Scholarly International Journal
Plagiarism is checked by the leading plagiarism checker
Call for Paper
Volume 2 Issue 5
September-October 2026
Explainable AI Frameworks for Improving Transparency in Automated Decision-Making Systems
| Author(s) | Emma van Leeuwen |
|---|---|
| Country | Netherlands |
| Abstract | The increasing adoption of artificial intelligence in automated decision-making has created a growing need for systems capable of providing understandable and verifiable explanations for their outputs. Machine learning algorithms can process complex information and generate predictions across diverse application domains, yet sophisticated predictive models often provide limited insight into the factors influencing individual decisions. This lack of transparency can complicate accountability, reduce opportunities for meaningful human oversight, and make it difficult to identify inappropriate dependencies within automated processes. Explainable artificial intelligence offers methodological approaches for addressing these concerns through interpretable models, feature-attribution techniques, local explanations, and structured decision documentation. This hypothetical methodological study examines explainable AI frameworks for improving transparency in automated decision-making systems. The proposed approach integrates interpretable surrogate modeling, explanation fidelity assessment, explanation stability evaluation, and human-centered interpretation. A hypothetical analytical scenario is constructed to illustrate the relationship between explanation complexity, agreement with an underlying predictive model, and consistency under small input changes. Two illustrative comparisons are developed using assumed explanation-agreement counts and perturbation-stability outcomes. The analytical calculations demonstrate how explanatory methods can differ across fidelity and stability dimensions. More detailed explanations are assigned greater agreement with the illustrative predictive system, while simpler explanations are assigned greater stability under the specified assumptions. These relationships are features of the hypothetical scenario rather than experimentally established findings. The study contributes a structured methodological framework for evaluating explainable AI systems beyond the mere availability of explanatory outputs. It emphasizes that transparency requires appropriate explanation fidelity, understandable presentation, documented limitations, and mechanisms for responsible review. The paper concludes that explainable AI can support more accountable automated decision-making, but reliable implementation requires empirical validation and careful consideration of explanation accuracy, usability, fairness, and system governance. |
| Keywords | Explainable Artificial Intelligence, Automated Decision-Making, Algorithmic Transparency, Interpretable Machine Learning, Explanation Fidelity, Explainability, Decision Accountability, Model Interpretability, Human Oversight, Artificial Intelligence Governance. |
| Field | Engineering |
| Published In | Volume 1, Issue 1, March-April 2025 |
| Published On | 2025-04-09 |
Share this

E-ISSN: 3067-5073
CrossRef DOI is assigned to each research paper published in our journal.
IJMLAIDSE DOI prefix is
10.00000/IJMLAIDSE
All research papers published on this website are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, and all rights belong to their respective authors/researchers.